Your cellphone continuously creates a durable and revealing digital trail that law enforcement can obtain with a warrant.

Updated on June 29 at 3:50 p.m. The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that when law enforcement officials used a “geofence ...

The Supreme Court just granted your location data the same protections as other personal data. Here's how that affects you.

The U.S. Supreme Court has issued a far-reaching decision on the constitutionality of a law enforcement tool that allows police to access the location histories of millions of cell phone users. In a ...

Writing for the 6-3 majority, Justice Elena Kagan said that the technique, known as geofencing, violates the Fourth Amendment ...

The Supreme Court ruled Monday that law enforcement’s use of a geofence warrant to obtain cellphone location data constitutes ...

The Federalist Society produced a webinar recently that I found fascinating, not only because I was a panelist. There was a marked divergence of opinion on Fourth Amendment law. I believe I know where ...

The 6-3 ruling in Chatrie v. United States held that a so-called geofence warrant — which compels companies such as Google to ...

The Supreme Court will decide if using broad “geofence warrants” to collect cell phone location data without suspicion violates the Fourth Amendment. In a 2019 case, law enforcement used such a ...

The Fourth Amendment doesn’t ask how you feel. It asks what a reasonable person would perceive. That’s not a technicality — ...

In his Cyber Crime column, Peter A. Crusco, executive assistant district attorney, investigations division, Office of the Queens County District Attorney, addresses another communications technology ...