Your cellphone continuously creates a durable and revealing digital trail that law enforcement can obtain with a warrant.

The Supreme Court just granted your location data the same protections as other personal data. Here's how that affects you.

Updated on June 29 at 3:50 p.m. The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that when law enforcement officials used a “geofence ...

The U.S. Supreme Court has issued a far-reaching decision on the constitutionality of a law enforcement tool that allows police to access the location histories of millions of cell phone users. In a ...

Writing for the 6-3 majority, Justice Elena Kagan said that the technique, known as geofencing, violates the Fourth Amendment ...

In its first digital-privacy case since 2018, the court builds on a privacy precedent it set then.

The 6-3 ruling in Chatrie v. United States held that a so-called geofence warrant — which compels companies such as Google to ...

In his Cyber Crime column, Peter A. Crusco, executive assistant district attorney, investigations division, Office of the Queens County District Attorney, addresses another communications technology ...

The Federalist Society produced a webinar recently that I found fascinating, not only because I was a panelist. There was a marked divergence of opinion on Fourth Amendment law. I believe I know where ...

When applying Fourth Amendment doctrine, to what extent can race and ethnicity be considered? The Supreme Court denied cert on Monday in United States v. Carter, a case on this question—specifically, ...